What was truly dealt with there, and what was not
Week 2
A reflection for the week as we journey toward Easter
If the Cross was necessary, as we reflected last week, the next question follows naturally. Necessary for what?
Many people today are comfortable speaking about forgiveness, love, and acceptance, but far less comfortable speaking about sin. The word itself often feels outdated or harsh. We prefer the language of weakness, mistakes, or broken systems. These are not wrong words, but on their own they are not sufficient. If the Cross is to make sense, we must be honest about the problem it addresses.
For this week, we turn to Romans 3:21–26, a passage where the apostle Paul faces the problem of sin directly, without exaggeration and without evasion.
Paul begins by acknowledging something that unsettles both religious confidence and moral optimism. “All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.” Sin, in Paul’s account, is not confined to particularly wicked people or obvious crimes. It is a universal condition. It names a failure to live in the right relationship with God, a failure that reaches into motives, desires, and loyalties.
Importantly, Paul does not describe sin merely as rule-breaking. He describes it as falling short of God’s glory. That is, sin is not simply about what we have done wrong. It is about what we have failed to be. It names a deep misalignment between humanity and the God who made us.
This matters because it shapes what forgiveness can and cannot mean.
If sin were only about minor mistakes, forgiveness could be casual. It could be extended without cost or consequence. But Paul insists that sin involves guilt, not just weakness, and judgment, not just disappointment. God is not merely saddened by sin. He is opposed to it because it destroys what He loves.
This is why Paul introduces language that makes many modern readers uncomfortable. He speaks of justice, judgment, and righteousness. These are not abstractions. They describe God’s faithful commitment to truth and goodness. A God who ignores sin would not be loving. He would be indifferent.
At this point, Paul’s argument could easily lead to despair. If all have sinned, and if God is just, then where does hope lie? The answer Paul gives is not that God lowers His standards or looks away. Instead, he says that God acts.
“But now,” Paul writes, “a righteousness from God has been made known.” These words mark a turning point. God does not resolve the problem of sin by denying justice. He resolves it by satisfying justice in a way that opens the door to mercy.
Paul centres this resolution in the Cross. God presents Christ, he says, as a sacrifice of atonement. The language is deliberate and weighty. Something real is dealt with. Something objective happens. Sin is not simply forgotten. It is addressed.
This is where many misunderstandings arise. Some imagine that the Cross persuades a reluctant God to forgive. Others imagine that forgiveness simply sets sin aside without consequence. Paul refuses both ideas. The Cross reveals a God who is both just and the one who justifies. God remains faithful to His righteousness while making a way for sinners to be restored.
In other words, the Cross deals with guilt, not just feelings. It addresses judgment, not just shame. It reconciles justice and mercy, rather than choosing one at the expense of the other.
Paul is careful to add that this justification comes by grace. It is not earned. It is not achieved through moral effort or religious performance. It is received through trust. The Cross leaves no room for boasting, because it leaves no room for self-salvation.
This is where the Cross both humbles and comforts us.
It humbles us because it tells us the problem is deeper than we like to admit. We are not merely in need of improvement. We are in need of rescue. No amount of good intention or spiritual discipline can undo guilt or repair brokenness at this level.
At the same time, the Cross comforts us because it tells us that God has not left the problem unresolved. We are not asked to carry our guilt indefinitely, nor to prove ourselves worthy of forgiveness. What needed to be dealt with has been dealt with.
It is important to say what the Cross does not do. It does not excuse sin or call it insignificant. It does not deny responsibility. It does not remove the need for repentance or transformation. But it does remove the burden of condemnation for those who trust in Christ.
This is why the Cross remains central to Christian faith. Without it, forgiveness becomes shallow, and grace becomes vague. With it, forgiveness becomes costly and grace becomes astonishing.
As we continue this journey, we are invited to let the Cross tell us the truth, not only about God’s mercy, but about our need. Only then can mercy be received as mercy, rather than assumed as entitlement.
To stand before the Cross is to acknowledge that something was wrong that we could not fix, and to trust that God has done what we could not.
Prayer
Lord Jesus Christ,
we stand again before Your Cross.
Give us eyes to see what You have done,
hearts to trust what You have accomplished,
and lives shaped by the grace that flows from it.
Keep us from treating the Cross lightly,
or leaving it behind too quickly.
Teach us to live under its shadow,
until faith gives way to sight.
Amen.
This post is part of a seven-week Easter journey titled The Cross of Christ: A Journey for Thoughtful Believers. Each week reflects on one aspect of the Cross, anchored in a single passage of Scripture, and written for fellow believers who want to think carefully, without jargon, about what Christ has done. If you would like to read the reflections from the beginning, you can start with Week 1 here: https://joshuawathanga.com/why-the-cross-was-necessary/
No responses yet